Amyris
Fernandez
81
J A N E I RO
/
F E V E R E I RO
D E
2006 – REV I STA DA ESPM
BALASUBRAMANIAN
,SivaK.BeyondAdvertising
andPublicity:HybridMessages,TheirEffectiveness
andPublicPolicy Issues. Journal ofAdvertising, v.
23, n. 4, p. 29-46, 1994.
BANDURA
, A. Principlesof BehaviorModification.
NewYork: Holt, Rinehart andWinston, 1969.
BATRA
,Rajeev;
RAY
,MichaelL.SituationalEffects
ofAdvertisingRepetition:TheModerating Influence
ofMotivation,Ability,andOpportunity toRespond.
Journal of Consumer Research, v. 12n. 3, p. 432-
445, 1986.
BELTRAMINI
, Richard F. The Impact of Infomer-
cials: Perspectives of Advertisers andAdvertising
Agencies. Journal of Advertising Research, v. 23,
n. 4, p. 25-31,1983.
CHAPMAN
, Patricia S.,
BELTRAMINI
, Richard F.
InfomercialsRevisited:perspectivesofadvertising
professionals. Journal of Advertising Research,
September-October 24-31, 2000.
DEIGHTON
, John;
SCHINDLER
, Robert M. Can
Advertising InfluenceExperience?Psychologyand
Marketing, v. 5, n. 1, p. 103-115, 1988.
DONTHU
, Naveen;
GILLIAND
, D. Observations:
the infomercial shopper. Journal of Advertising
Research, March/April, p. 69-76,1996.
ELLIOT
, Michael E.; SPECK, Paul S. Antecedents
andConsequencesofInfomercialViewership.Journal
of Direct Marketing, v. 9, n. 2, p. 39-51, 1995.
ELLIOT
, Michael E.; Lockard, P. An Analysis of
InformationContent in InfomercialPrograms.Journal
of Direct Marketing, v. 10, n. 2, p. 44-55, 1996.
FORD
, Gary T.;
SMITH
,
Darlene B.;
SWASY
; John
L. Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims:
TestingHypothesis fromEconomicsof Information.
Journal of Consumer Research, v. 16, n. 3, p.
433-441, 1990.
GARFIELD
, R. Sominex Infomercials Issues a
wake up call. Advertising Age, Nov. 1, 1993.
GEHRT
, Kenneth C.,
CARTER
, K. An exploratory
assessmentofcatalogshoppingorientations.Journal
of Direct Marketing, v. 6, n. 1, p. 29-39, 1992.
HA
, Young-Won;
HOCH
, Stephen J. Ambiguity,
Processing Strategy, and Advertising-Evidence
Interactions. Journal of Consumer Research, v.
16, p. 354-60, 1989.
KEMPF
, Deanna S.;
SMITH
, Robert E. Consumer
ProcessingofProductTrial and the InfluenceofPrior
Advertising:AStructuralModelingApproach.Journal
ofMarketingResearch,v. 35,n. 8,p. 325-338,1998.
KRUGMAN
, Herbert E. The Impact of Television
Advertising: LearningWithout Involvement. Public
Opinion Quarterly, v. 29, n. 3, p. 349-356, 1965.
MACINNIS
, Deborah J.;
JAWORSKI
, Bernard J.
Information Processing From Advertisements:
Towardan IntegrativeFramework. Journal ofMar-
keting, n. 53, v. 10, p. 1-23, 1989.
MACINNIS
, Deborah J.
;
JAWORSKI
, Bernard J.
EnhancingandMeasuringConsumersMotivation,
Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Infor-
mation from Ads. Journal of Marketing, n. 55 n.
10, p. 32-53, 1991.
MACKENZIE
, Scott B. The Role of Attention in
Mediating the Effect of Advertising on Attribute
Importance. Journal of Consumer Research, v.
13, n. 9, p. 174-195, 1986.
MARKS
, Lawrence;
KAMINS
, M. The Use of Pro-
ductSamplingandAdvertising:EffectsofSequence
of Expense and Degree of Advertising Claim
ExaggerationonConsumersBeliefStrength;Belief
Confidence, and Attitudes. Journal of Marketing
Research, v. 25, n. 8, p. 266-282, 1988.
MEYERS-LEVY
,Joan;
PERACHIO
,LauraA.Getting
an Angle in Advertising: The Effect of Camera
AngleonProductEvaluations,JournalofMarketing
Research, v. 24, n. 11, p. 454-61, 1992.
NORD
,Walter R.;
PETER
, J. P. A Behavior Modi-
ficationPerspectiveonMarketing. Journal ofMar-
keting, v. 44, p. 36-47, 1980.
SINGH
, Madeep,
BALASUBRAMANIAN
,
Siva K.,
CHAKRABORTY
, G. A comparative analysis of three
communicationformats:advertising,infomercials,direct
experience Journal ofAdvertising, v. XXIX, n. 4, 2001.
SINGH
,SurendraN.;
COLE
,CatherineA.TheEffects
of Length, Content, and Repetition on Television
Commercial Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing
Research, v. 30 n. 2, p. 91-104, 1991.
SMITH
, Robert E. Integrating Information from Ad-
vertising and Trial: Processes and Effects on
ConsumerResponse toProduct Information. Journal
of Marketing Research, v. 30, n. 5, 204-219, 1993.
SMITH
, Robert E.;
SWINYARD
, William R. Infor-
mation Response.
Models: An Integrated Approach. Journal of
Marketing, v. 46, n. 4, p. 81-93, 1982.
SMITH
, Robert E.;
SWINYARD
,WilliamR. Attitude-
Behavior Consistency: The Impact of Product Trial
VersusAdvertising. Journal ofMarketingResearch,
v. 20, n. 8, p. 257-267, 1983.
SMITH
,Robert E.;
SWINYARD
,WilliamR. Cognitive
Response toAdvertising and Trial: Belief Strength,
Belief ConfidenceandProduct Curiosity. Journal of
Advertising Research, v. 17, n. 3, p. 3-14, 1988.
WICKS
, Jan LeBlanc Which factors primarily
influence the number of infomercial hours a
commercial television airs? The Journal ofMedia
Economics, v. 10, n. 1, 29-38, 1998.
WIKIPEDIA
Ed Valenti. Disponível em: <http://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Valenti>.Acessoem:1º
de Jul. 2005.
WOJTAS
,GaryW.TheRenaissanceofthe Infomercial.
Direct Marketing, v. 53, n. 5, p. 30-32, 1990.
WRIGHT
,AliceA.; Lynch, John G. Communication
Effects of Advertising versus Direct Experience
When Both Search and Experience Attributes are
Present. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 21, N.
3, p. 708-718,1995.
BIBLIOGRAFIA
AUTORA
AMYRISFERNANDEZ
Mestre em Comércio Eletrônico pelo Rochester
Institute of Technology; doutoranda em
Comunicação; professora da ESPM.
